Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Sierra Bullones
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I'm closing this discussion as Keep based on consensus and also the fact that the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Liz Read! Talk! 04:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Battle of Sierra Bullones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason This page does not meet Wikipedia's notability and content standards for historical events. The article lacks reliable sources and citations to verify the claims made about the battle. Furthermore, the page has not been expanded or maintained to provide substantial and detailed information about the event. Given that the topic does not appear in notable historical references or publications and lacks significant coverage from academic or reliable sources, I believe this page does not fulfill the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. Tahanido (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I think that 7 cited sources (including the Royal Academy of History, the University of Valencia, diaries of people who participated in the war and the Cambridge University Press) are enough to verify that this event happened and there are no reasons at all to delete this article. RobertJohnson35 (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Morocco, and Spain. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I was surprised how nonsensical this rationale was until I realised it was 100% AI-generated. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.