Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peko Precision Products
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Peko Precision Products (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any reliable, third-party sources to demonstrate the notability of this private company. Powers T 16:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a designer and contract manufacturer for custom technological solutions with no mininal showing of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't appear to satisfy notability guidelines. Only 2 Google News hits, and one of those was a mention in a death notice of a former employee. On the whole, not finding enough significant coverage to merit inclusion. Cocytus [»talk«] 21:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I guess that the motivation to create this article is due to this revert by me which asked for proofs of notability for Peko before adding it to the list of companies in the Rochester, New York article. The article is still lacking any proof of notability. This seems to be a case of self promotion. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.