Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviendo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete as A7/G11 (non-admin closure). SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Aviendo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is far too promotional in my opinion. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete -- article fails notability criteria for WP:CORP. My online search of Danish sources found no significant independent coverage of this company. (In fact, I see nothing on the page which would have prevented this article from being speedy deleted per WP:A7.) — CactusWriter (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete An article with a promotional tone by a WP:SPA, sourced only to the firm itself. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. (I have also tagged it CSD A7 and G11.) AllyD (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.